Legal Opinion
Glickman v. New York Life Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 1943PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
The suit is on a life insurance policy. The insurer’s defense is based on what the insurer calls the violation of a condition precedent which violation, according to defendant, produced a situation where," although a policy was issued, no insurance thereunder ever took effect. On December 13, 1939, Louis C. Katz applied to defendant for a $5,000 policy of insurance on his life. In the application form which was furnished to him by defendant and which he signed, there appeared this language: “It is mutually agreed as follows: 1. That the insurance hereby applied for shall * * * go into force *…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Geer v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Drilling v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- New York Life Insurance v. WatkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- New York Life Insurance Company v. WatkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ambac Assur. Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Berger v. Manhattan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Syncora Guarantee Inc. v. EMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Giuliani v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Irv-Bob Formal Wear, Inc. v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.