Legal Opinion

Bowler v. Stewart-Warner Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1989No. 86-1134Published

1Opinion of the Court

563 A.2d 344 (1989)

Anne T. BOWLER, Appellant,

v.

STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 86-1134.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued June 9, 1988.

Decided August 18, 1989.

Karl N. Marshall, with whom William C. Burgy, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Laurence T. Scott, with whom Leo A. Roth, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge,[1] and MACK and FERREN, Associate Judges.

MACK, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment for appellee rendered by the trial court notwithstanding the verdict (n.o.v.) in a products liability…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API