Legal Opinion
HE Butt Grocery Company v. Marroquin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 5, 1971No. 14978PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARROW, Chief Justice.
A venue action involving Subdivision 9a, Article 1995, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes. Plaintiff, Mercedes D. Marro-quin, brought suit to recover for damages allegedly sustained in a “slip and fall” on some slippery substance which was on the floor of one of defendant’s grocery stores in San Antonio. Defendant’s plea of privilege to transfer said cause to its residence in Nueces County was overruled after a non-jury trial. Defendant urges that there is no evidence or insufficient evidence to support the implied findings of the trial court that the negligence of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
- Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- H. E. Butt Grocery Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- J. Weingarten, Inc. v. RazeyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- HE Butt Grocery Company v. QuickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- H. E. B. Food Stores v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Albertson's, Inc. v. MungiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- H. E. Butt Grocery Stores, Inc. v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- J. Weingarten, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.