Legal Opinion

Dato v. George W. Armstrong Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 1922No. 10026. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Writ of err granted January 10, 1923. George W. Armstrong Co., Incorporated, owns and operates an iron foundry in the city of Fort Worth. Ed Dato, who was a welder by trade, was employed by Fred Barney, superintendent of the oil well supply department of the company, to do some repairs on a gear wheel in the oil well supply department; such repair work requiring the services of a welder. A gas generator was used in making such repairs, and while Dato was using it for that purpose the tank of the generator bursted. Dato then undertook to repair the generator, and while so engaged there was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cunningham v. International RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Byrne v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Cunningham & Ellis v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tanner v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Dato v. George W. Armstrong & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API