Legal Opinion

Barker v. Barker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 6, 1992No. 90-3375PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHIVERS, Judge.

The former husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution. We reverse and remand.

Appellant argues that this case should be remanded to divide the furnishings and personal effects. Appellee concedes this point, and we agree. See section 61.075(1), Florida State (1989). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand to the trial court to reconsider the entire equitable scheme. Sweeney v. Sweeney, 583 So.2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Breland v. Breland, 565 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

The former husband further correctly asserts that the final judgment does not comply with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrs v. BarrsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Prom v. PromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Sweeney v. SweeneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Bauzon v. BauzonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MID-AM WASTE SYSTEMS OF FLA., INC. v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API