Legal Opinion

Carroll v. McNeill Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1978No. 7727DC728PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motions for summary judgment and directed verdict for the reason that the signed audit statement and the entry of the $3,000.00 in plaintiff’s books as an account payable established, as a matter of law, the existence of an account stated between plaintiff and defendant. We cannot agree.

On the subject of accounts stated, our courts have declared:

“To constitute a stated account there must be a balance struck and agreed upon as correct after examination and adjustment of the account. However, express examination or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neal v. MarroneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Nello L. Teer Company v. Dickerson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Archer v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Archer v. . McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Little v. . ShoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FCX, INC. v. Ocean Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Harden v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API