Legal Opinion

Salmon v. Olds & King

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

The complaint in this action charges the defendants with having “wrongfully, unlawfully, maliciously and with force, taken and detained certain personal property, a portion of which belonged to plaintiff, and the balance of which was in her possession as special bailee of a third party, to her damage in the sum of 0500.00.” It further charge's the defendants with “ wrongfully, maliciously and unlawfully ” converting a specified portion of such property, to her damage in the sum of $338.50, the value thereof.

The answer denies the ownership and bailment, and denies the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. North Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Bennett v. Lockwood & CarterNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. McGregor v. ArmillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  4. Busenius v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Ward v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Godvig v. LopezOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Miami Quarry Co. v. Seaborg Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Gregoire v. RourkeOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Perkins v. McCulloughOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Dose v. ToozeOregon Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API