Legal Opinion

Kent v. Muscarello

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1973No. 71-389PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Abrahamson

The question here presented is whether an action for malicious prosecution is one for “injury to real or personal property” or “to the person”, or, where two of the defendants are policemen, it is one “against officers for misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance” within the meaning of the survival statute so as to survive plaintiffs death.

After the plaintiff died the executor of his estate asked leave to be substituted as plaintiff. Defendants objected and moved to dismiss the action with prejudice on the ground that the action did not survive. The court denied leave and dismissed the action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. BierdIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McDaniel v. BullardIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Krawiec v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Shedd v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Denslow v. HutchinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beard v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. William J. Templeman Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Jarvis v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  4. Beard v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Gates v. MontalbanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API