Legal Opinion

Hammett v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1918No. 8420PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. MeKeown, Judge. Action by Hunter Montgomery and William McGirt against W. D. Hammett. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This action was filed in the district court of ¡Seminole county, by Hunter Montgomery and William McGirt, for the recovery of 120 acres of land in said county from one W. D. Hammett, and for rents in (he sum of $500, and for the cancellation of certain void conveyances of record affecting the title to. the land in controversy. As a defense, the defendant Hammett alleged in substance that he was in the adverse possession .of the land in controversy, claiming to be the owner thereof at the time of the execution of the deeds to the plaintiff Montgomery, through which Montgomery claimed title;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. FryerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Murrow Indian Orphans' Home v. McClendonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Jennings v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Bilby v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randolph v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Cox v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Sells v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Jenson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API