Legal Opinion

Estate of Stanhope

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1898No. Appeal, No. 141PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 141, Jan. T., 1897, by Charles W. Miller, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., sustaining exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 141, Jan. T., 1897, by Charles W. Miller, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., sustaining exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The auditing judge, Ashman, J., reported the facts to be as follows: The decedent gave to Mary E. Heisler her bond and mortgage, dated January 1, 1887, for $5,000, with, interest from January 1, 1886. The mortgage was secured upon certain premises, one half interest in which was afterwards devised to Mrs. Heisler by the testatrix. In April, 1896, Robert Foerderer purchased from Mrs. Heisler for $30,000 her right and title in one half of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

We find no error in the decree from which this appeal was taken. Neither of the specifications of error requires discussion or even special notice. The questions involved were fully considered and correctly disposed of by the learned court below; and, on its opinion, the decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dobkin v. LandsbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Lackawanna Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. GomeringerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Orient Building & Loan Ass'n v. FreudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Ryon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Lupowitz v. Double Share Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API