Legal Opinion

Ex parte Wilson

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 10, 1929No. 130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HENNING, District Judge.

This is a proceeding by habeas corpus in whieh the petitioner -asks to be discharged from an order of deportation issued by the Secretary of Labor, directing that petitioner be deported to Great Britain, the country of his allegiance.

The warrant of deportation charges that the petitioner is in the United States in vio*538lation of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917, §19 (8 USCA § 155), in that:(a) He has been convicted of a felony or other crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, prior to entry into the United States, to wit) petty larceny; and that:(b)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tillinghast v. EdmeadCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
  2. Bendel v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Bartos v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Wong Yow v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  5. Redway v. GraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Paladino v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API