Legal Opinion

Radoff v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1974No. 18334PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

Arnold Radoff and his son Michael Ra-doff sued Utica Mutual Insurance Company, herein called Utica, and its agent Andrew J. Rogers, Jr., d/b/a Metro Insurance Services. The suit is against Utica on a Family Combination Automobile Policy and, alternatively, against Rogers for misrepresenting the coverage afforded by the policy. Utica filed a cross-claim against Rogers to recover any amount the Radoffs might recover against it. The trial court, sitting without a jury, denied the plaintiffs’ suit as well as the cross-claim, and the plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

It appears from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State of California Department of Mental Hygiene v. Bank of the Southwest National Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Owen Development Company v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bavousett v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. NewsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DiFrancesco v. Houston General Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
  2. RLI Insurance v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API