Radoff v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice.
Arnold Radoff and his son Michael Ra-doff sued Utica Mutual Insurance Company, herein called Utica, and its agent Andrew J. Rogers, Jr., d/b/a Metro Insurance Services. The suit is against Utica on a Family Combination Automobile Policy and, alternatively, against Rogers for misrepresenting the coverage afforded by the policy. Utica filed a cross-claim against Rogers to recover any amount the Radoffs might recover against it. The trial court, sitting without a jury, denied the plaintiffs’ suit as well as the cross-claim, and the plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.
It appears from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- State of California Department of Mental Hygiene v. Bank of the Southwest National Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Owen Development Company v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Bavousett v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Travelers Insurance Company v. NewsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DiFrancesco v. Houston General Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
- RLI Insurance v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006