Legal Opinion

Lichter v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1944No. 9599PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant company submitted a written offer to do the masonry work for the Fluorescent Lamp Plant which the Westinghouse Company was building at Fair-mount, West Virginia, for $78,000. The offer was accepted and a written contract entered into between the parties. The construction work was subsequently completed and paid for. Thereafter, appellant company claimed that, by virtue of an agreement, resting partly in parol and partly integrated in the above-mentioned written contract, it. was also entitled to do the masonry work on an adjoining Glass.Plant. When the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harding v. TaubelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  2. Haas Bros. v. Hamburg-bremen Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sam MacRi & Sons, Inc., a Corporation, and Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. U. S. A. For the Use of Oaks Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API