Nichols v. Haehn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The plaintiffs have instituted this action under article 15 of the Real Property Law to obtain a determination that they are the owners of an unencumbered fee in certain real property. The answering defendants, Haehn, Weinstein and Wallace, dispute plaintiffs’ title and they, in turn, have counterclaimed under said article 15 and have requested that plaintiffs be barred from any claim of title and that it be determined that such answering defendants are vested with clear title in fee.
*407The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment and the defendants countered with a similar motion. The Trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Upington v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Richardson v. HolmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Brown v. Independent Baptist Church of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Trustees of Calvary Presbyterian Church v. PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ahders v. AhdersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Board of Education v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Perla v. Real Property Holdings, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- NYCTL 1998-1 v. MayfieldNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Njcb Spec-1, LLC v. BudnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018