Legal Opinion

Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Silva

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1999No. 04-98-00602-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATHERINE STONE, Justice.

In this appeal we are asked to review the validity of substituted service on a surplus lines insurer. The appellant insurance companies (collectively “Commercial Union”) challenge a default judgment, claiming that appellees (collectively “Silva”) did not properly comply with service of process requirements under Tex. Ins.Code Ann. art. 1.36, § 12 (Vernon 1998). In this case of first impression, we find that Silva did not properly serve process on Commercial Union under the applicable statutes. As a result, we reverse the default judgment and remand the case to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. Interkal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Whitney v. L & L REALTY CORPORATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Michael Victor Miller, Ralph Fields Norwood, III and Burgers of Diamond Bar v. Hudson's Grill International Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  3. Michael Victor Miller, Ralph Fields Norwood, III and Burgers of Diamond Bar v. Hudson's Grill International Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  4. Michael Victor Miller, Ralph Fields Norwood, III and Burgers of Diamond Bar v. Hudson's Grill International Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API