E.L. v. State

BARKETT, Chief Justice.

We have for review State v. E.L., 595 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), in which the district court upheld the constitutionality of a city ordinance that prohibits loitering for the purpose of engaging in drug-related activity. We have jurisdiction.1

E.L. and R.W. are minors who were charged with loitering for the purpose of engaging in drug-related activity in violation of Sanford’s Ordinance No. 2032.2

*253They moved to dismiss the charges on grounds that the ordinance is facially unconstitutional. The trial court granted the motions, finding that the ordinance is over-broad…