Godman v. Boggs
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below, before Round, J. The case is cited in the opinion. cited Hibbard v. Weil dKahn, 5 Neb., 41. Shellenbarger v. Biser, 5Neb., 195. ‘ Code, sec. 38. Seager v. Burns, 4 Minn., 141. Daily v. Litchfield, 10 Mich., 29. Agardv. Valencia, 39 Cal., 292. Crosby v. Davis, 9 Iowa, 98. cited Kegg v. The State, 10 Ohio, 75 and note.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below, before Round, J. The case is cited in the opinion. cited Hibbard v. Weil dKahn, 5 Neb., 41. Shellenbarger v. Biser, 5Neb., 195. ‘ Code, sec. 38. Seager v. Burns, 4 Minn., 141. Daily v. Litchfield, 10 Mich., 29. Agardv. Valencia, 39 Cal., 292. Crosby v. Davis, 9 Iowa, 98. cited Kegg v. The State, 10 Ohio, 75 and note. Patton v. Sheriff, 2 Ohio, 395. Shuee v. Ferguson, 3 Ohio, 136. Benhcwn v. Corwin, 2 Ohio State, 36-43. Kellogg v. Griffin, 17 Johns, N. Y., 273. Dickman v. Cook, 17 Johns, N. Y., 332. Rickards v. Cunningham, 10 Neb.,…
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
*14This is an action to enforce the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. It is stated in the petition that Charles T. Boggs is the receiver of the Lincoln Building and Savings Association, and that on the 11th day of July, 1878, said association being the owner of lots 4, 5 and C in block 21, in the city of Lincoln, sold the same to Charles C. Godman, for the sum of $2,385.50 to be paid as follows : $535.50 on the 11th day of July, 1879, and upon said payment being made said Godman to receive from said corporation a warranty deed for said lots, and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hein v. WT Rawleigh CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Glenn v. GlennNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Hilton v. First Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Carlton v. AmGuard Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Hein v. WT Rawleigh CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958