State v. Dilldine
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The defendant assigns numerous exceptions to the judge’s charge to the jury sufficient we think to merit a new trial. In view of this, we will not go into the factual situation in greater detail. The evidence was ample to go to the jury.
At the outset, it should be noted that this was one offense and not two. It was improper to have two bills of indictment and two offenses growing out of this one episode. The mere fact that some of the shots entered from the front and some entered from the back does not make two offenses. It would be just as reasonable to have five offenses…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.