Legal Opinion

Makowski v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1992No. 90-2169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We conclude that the BTA’s decision is unlawful and, consequently, reverse it.

Before the enactment of H.B. No. 146 (141 Ohio Laws, Part I, 1472, eff. September 11, 1985), a budget commission distributed its county’s classified property tax collections, also known as the intangibles tax, to the county’s public libraries (and other subdivisions). See former R.C. 5705.32, S.B. No. 117, 137 Ohio Laws, Part I, 291. H.B. No. 146 eliminated the classified property tax, R.C. 5707.04, and, to replace this revenue source, R.C. 5747.-03(A)(2) credited 6.3 percent of Ohio’s income tax collections to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cooke v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Snodgrass v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Snodgrass v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Zupancic v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Zupancic v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API