Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Chemical Nat. Bank of New York

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1923No. 3 Div. 601PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The Chemical National Bank of New York filed this bill, averring in substance that, in pursuance of an agreement with the Merchants’ Bank of Montgomery, complainant accepted four drafts, aggregating $100,000, drawn against it by the HallBeale Cotton Company, and credited the proceeds to the Merchants’ Bank, which used them in its business. These drafts were secured by the pledge of 1,185 bales of cotton stored in warehouses in Montgomery, the Merchants’ Bank retaining the warehouse receipts. Through the negligence of the Merchants’ Bank the I-Iall-Beale Cotton Company procured the receipts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. GurleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Florida Land & Imp. Co. v. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1892
  3. Pinkston v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Blythe v. EnslenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Thompson v. Fourth Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Lightsey v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Chemical Nat. Bank v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API