Legal Opinion

Cullom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1967No. 40159Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DICE, Judge.

The conviction is for knowingly passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, five years.

Trial was had and notice of appeal given after January 1, 1966.

Three grounds of error are urged by the appellant in his brief filed in the trial court.

In two of the grounds, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction and that the court erred in refusing to charge the jury on circumstantial evidence.

The evidence presented by the state germane to such grounds shows that, on the date alleged, the appellant came to the place of business where the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Boatright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API