Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cantrell v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2000No. WD 57509Published

1DissentHarold L. Lowenstein, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority contends the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts “exercised unautho*829rized discretion in staying its revocation of Cantrell’s license.” In support of this argument, the majority relies upon statutory language that the license be “automatically revoked” and contends, “we interpret ‘automatically’ to mean that the General Assembly was restricting the board’s discretion.” Therefore, “the board’s only determination was whether Cantrell was convicted of a felony that reasonably related to the qualifications, functions or duties of a physician.” 1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Francois v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Remington v. City of BoonvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Christiansen v. Missouri State Board of AccountancyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API