Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Kulbaski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), dated September 18, 2009, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Mark J. Kulbaski and Dutchess *787Surgical Associates, EC., the defendant Jayesh R. Modi, and the defendant St. Francis Hospital, Poughkeepsie, New York, which were to quash nine subpoenas duces tecum served by the plaintiffs upon nonparties and imposed certain conditions for the admission at trial of any documents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kooper v. KooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Mendelovitz v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Weinberg v. Remyco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tribeca Space Mgrs., Inc. v. Tribeca Mews Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Castellano v. EstradaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API