In re Maestretti
Nevada Supreme Court
Proceedings for the disbarment of A. J. Maestretti, an attorney. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The facts upon which this proceeding was based are very fully set forth in the opinion rendered in the proceedings against Peter Breen for disbarment (30 Nev. 164), to which opinion reference is made for a more complete understanding of this case. In response to the citation, respondent filed an answer, in which he admitted making the statement attributed to him at the time and in the manner charged in the citation. For convenience of consideration the statement of respondent in question is here repeated: "If it please the court, at this time I wish to rise to the question of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re BreenNevada Supreme Court · 1908
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- People v. TorresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- McGehee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. DwyerNevada Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re RaggioNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Waters v. BarrNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Melville v. WettengelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- In re MaestrettiNevada Supreme Court · 1908