Legal Opinion

Branson v. Kutz

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 26, 1901No. 30PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

The appellants tiled a bill in the court below, charging respondents with infringing the first, fourth; fifth, and sixth claims of patent No. 33:5,102, granted December 29; 1885, to Edwin E. Branson for a knitting machine. The action of (hat court in dismissing the hill (.105 Fed. 974) on the ground of non: infringement is here assigned in error. After due consideration, we are of opinion there was no error, and the decree below should be affirmed. The patent concerns devices for mechanically shifting the needles of circular knitting machines in order to knit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Branson v. KutzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mayo Knitting Machine & Needle Co. v. Jenckes Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API