Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. Buckley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1910No. 1,986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On rehearing. Denied.

1Opinion of the Court

McCALD, District Judge.

The relief sought by the petition to rehear is stated in the petition, and is as follows:

“That the opinion and decree of this court and of the court below shall be so modified as to provide that the complainant, Ruggles, in accounting for the proceeds realized by him from the sale of trust lands and timber, shall retain for his own sole use and benefit, all compensation earned by Mm under the contracts between himself and outside investors, for services "rendered by him subsequent to the dissolution of the partnership, in earing for and protecting the interests of such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Stove Co. v. Cleveland Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  2. Ruggles v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. Ruggles v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grant v. FletcherDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  2. Ruggles v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API