Rudiger v. . Coleman
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 18, 1912, directing the payment of certain moneys. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The order is appeal-able.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 18, 1912, directing the payment of certain moneys. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The order is appeal-able. (P. N. Bank v. Bayne, 140 N. Y. 328; J. M. Agency v. Rothschild, 155 N. Y. 255.) The order appealed from, directing the payment by the plaintiffs to the defendants of the sums of money therein specified, is right and should be affirmed. (Haebler v. Myers, 132 N. Y. 366; Goepel v. Robinson Machine Co., 122 App. Div. 26; Holly v. Gibbons, 177 N. Y.…
1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.
The facts involved in this action as originally set forth in the voluminous complaint were somewhat complicated, and this general feature of complexity has not diminished any as the litigation has progressed. Fortunately it will not be necessary in the disposition of the question now before us to refer to many of the facts alleged and developed on the trial, as our concern will be with various orders which have been made in the attempt to carry out the decision of this court and secure to the parties certain rights which had been thereby fixed.
The plaintiffs made with the defendants, and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merriam v. Wood & Parker Lithographing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Matter of BeschNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Standard Electric Equipment Corp. v. LaszkowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Breuchaud v. RudigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914