Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Franklin

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 26, 1998No. 98 C 2594PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MANNING, District Judge.

Defendants Aretha Franklin and Springtime Music Publishing, Inc. (SMP) move to dismiss this action for improper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 or, alternatively, to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants their motion to transfer pursuant to § 1404.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs William Sanders and Joy Over One Publishing Company (Joy Over One), both citizens of Illinois, brought this action against entertainer Aretha Franklin and SMP, invoking federal jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Heller Financial, Inc. v. Riverdale Auto Parts, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API