United States v. Djoumessi
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
The federal government successfully prosecuted Joseph Djoumessi for violating one (happily) obscure statute — holding someone in involuntary servitude — and for violating another less obscure statute— harboring an alien for private financial gain. Djoumessi claims that the charges violated his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause and that the government failed to support the involuntary-servitude conviction (and a related conspiracy conviction) with sufficient evidence. We affirm.
I
In 1996, Joseph and Evelyn Djoumessi, immigrants from Cameroon living in a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Elat v. NgoubeneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- United States v. DannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Samuel Mullet, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Jean ToviaveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.