Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Union Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1942No. 14325PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

Plaintiff Union Bank & Trust Company, a State banking corporation, hereinafter called Bank, instituted this suit against W. Scott Gardner and his wife, Helen Gardner, to recover judgment on a note in the principal sum of $15,716.10, with interest and attorney’s fees, less certain admitted credits, and to foreclose a deed of trust lien on twenty-six described tracts of land in the City of Fort Worth, Texas. Allegations were made of the execution by the Gardners of the note and the deed of trust, and that the debt was due.

Several other persons were named by plaintiff as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Withers v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Davis v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Steele v. RennTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Eubanks v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Glover v. CoitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ladehoff v. LadehoffTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gardner v. Union Bank & Trust Co. of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Harrold v. First Nat. Bank of Fort WorthDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1950
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. of Fort Worth v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Glover v. LandesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API