Legal Opinion
Timbone v. Stuyvesant Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.
This is an action for a judgment declaring defendant Stuyvesant Insurance Company (hereinafter : Stuyvesant) and defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (hereinafter: MVAIC) liable to plaintiff.
On or about November 29, 1961, Stuyvesant issued an automobile liability insurance policy covering the vehicle owned by the plaintiff insured. Part III, Coverage D of the policy provides that the insured will ‘ ‘ pay all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Conte v. Yorkshire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- In re the Arbitration between American National Fire Insurance & McCormackNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- In re the Arbitration between Berman & Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kahn v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- In re the Arbitration between St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance & Vanguard Systems Resources, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989