Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Chestnut

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2012Published

1Dissent

Read, J. (dissenting).

Defendant Kevin Chestnut never protested joinder on the ground he advances on appeal. Because he did not preserve his objection, we may not review it. I would therefore affirm the conviction without reaching the issue of harmless error addressed by the majority.

CPL 200.40 (1) permits joinder of criminal counts against two or more defendants where (a) the defendants are charged with every offense alleged in the indictment, (b) all the offenses charged are based upon a common scheme or plan, (c) all of the offenses are based upon the same criminal transaction or (d) the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API