Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Tomlinson v. Landmark American Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 2016No. 2015-CA-0276Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partIjOVE, J.
li'I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. Procedurally, I disagree with the majority’s decision, based on Bd. of Supervisors of La. State Univ. & Mech. College v. Mid-City Holdings, LLC, 14-0506 (La.App, 4 Cir. 10/15/14), 151 So.3d 908, to convert the present appeal to -a supervisory writ application. Bd. of Supervisors is procedurally distinguishable in that the defendant filed an answer and reconventional demand. The plaintiff responded by filing a peremptory exception of prescription, which the trial court sustained dismissing the defendant’s recon-ventional demand. This Court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- John Bonura & Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Board of Supervisors v. Mid City Holdings, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Reynolds v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.