M.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
M.M. appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Because the State failed to prove that the officers had a reasonable suspicion that M.M. had engaged in criminal activity before they conducted an investigatory detention, we reverse.
*1201Officers Brown and Hall testified that while on routine patrol they were flagged down by an anonymous couple who reported a large group of approximately twenty black males vandalizing a vehicle. Shortly thereafter, the officers stopped M.M. and his three companions in the vicinity based upon what Officer Brown conceded was a “vague”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. HetlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997