Legal Opinion

M.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1999No. 97-02947Published

1Per curiam

M.M. appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Because the State failed to prove that the officers had a reasonable suspicion that M.M. had engaged in criminal activity before they conducted an investigatory detention, we reverse.

*1201Officers Brown and Hall testified that while on routine patrol they were flagged down by an anonymous couple who reported a large group of approximately twenty black males vandalizing a vehicle. Shortly thereafter, the officers stopped M.M. and his three companions in the vicinity based upon what Officer Brown conceded was a “vague”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. State v. HetlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API