Legal Opinion
United States v. American Ditch Ass'n
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided March 31, 1933No. 1762PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
The amended complaint alleges in plaintiff rights to the use of the waters of Boise river, prior to any and all of some 400 defendants (state of Idaho, counties, cities, corporations, associations and individuals), and prays the order in use of all parties be determined, likewise the “economical duty of water.”
Some defendants have defaulted, some have answered, and some have moved to .dismiss, in substance, for that in the courts of Idaho are two suits in one of which plaintiff is a party, wherein priorities or order in use of the waters has been finally adjudicated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Norwegian Barque TheklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Cotton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Ridgley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1951
- Sain v. Montana Power Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1934
- City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955