Legal Opinion

Beeler v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1926No. 26,828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was án action to recover on a policy of accident insurance. Defendant’s demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

The facts were these: Plaintiff held a policy of insurance issued by defendant, which among other matters bound defendant to indemnify him for loss of time through accidental injuries. It provided:

“The Continental Casualty Company, ... in consideration of the agreements and statements contained in the application herefor and the payment of an annual premium of S25 as therein provided, does on this 18th day of January, a.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rowan v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Hawthorne v. Protective Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Stice v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goff v. Aetna Life and Casualty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  2. Walker Ex Rel. Foristel v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Beeler v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Montgomery v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Bowling v. Illinois Bankers Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API