In re Application A-18503
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets IN RE APPLICATION A-18503 611 Cite as
286 Neb. 611
regard to the disclaimer advice claim, we conclude that the district court erred when it concluded on summary judgment that the statute of limitations barred the claim based on its determination that the O’Daniels were put on inquiry notice of the claim when they learned the amount of the tax liability in April 2002. We therefore reverse the order granting sum- mary judgment in favor of Murray on the disclaimer advice claim, and we remand the cause for further proceedings on the claim. With regard to the QTIP election…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Applied Underwriters v. S.E.B. Servs. of New YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- In re Application A-19594Nebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- Nebraska Firearms Owners Assn. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
- In re 2007 Appropriations of Niobrara River WatersNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Huse v. Dakota Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.