Legal Opinion
Fidelity Funding of California, Inc. v. Reinhold
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 22, 1997No. 1:95-cv-03130PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROSS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Fidelity Funding of California, Inc. (“Fidelity” or “FFOC”) has moved for partial summary judgment against defendants Isaac Reinhold, Mendel Kotlarsky, Michael Mendlovic, Masel Supply Company Corp. (“Masel”), Herbert Greenfield, Ciporah Greenfield, Thrifty Cosmetics & Sundries, Inc. (“Thrifty”), Joe Klein Dental Supplies & Equipment, Inc. (“Klein Dental”), United Talmudical Academy of Boro Park (“UTA”), Irving Goldstein, and Josef Goldstein 1 on causes of action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wight v. BankAmerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Krynski v. ChaseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Mendelsohn v. Jacobowitz (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.