De Long v. De Long Hook & Eye Co.
New York Supreme Court
Action to restrain defendant from using the name “DeLong ” in connection with the sale of hooks and eyes.
1Opinion of the Court
O’Brien:, J.
This action is brought to enjoin the defend- ' ant from using the name “ De Long ” in connection with the ■sale of hooks and eyes, and especially hooks and eyes in direct or colorable imitation of the plaintiffs’ hooks and eyes, upon the ground that the name “ De Long,” in connection with the words “ Hook and Eye,” constitutes á fraud upon the plaintiffs, and was adopted and continued in use for the purpose of enabling the defendant to avail itself of the established reputation of the plaintiffs’ hook? and eyes, which are known in the trade and to consumers as the “ De Long Hook…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Town of Venice v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Employers' Liability InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Charles S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dodge Stationery Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. T. M. Bissell Plow Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1902
- Westphal v. Westphal's World's Best Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Coca-Cola Co. v. StevensonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1920
- Tuerk Hydraulic Power Co. v. TuerkNew York Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.