Legal Opinion

BULLOCK v. HICE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00808Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAMONT BULLOCK, ) ) ) 2:20-cv-808-NR-MPK Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MIKE HICE, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION (ECF 100) Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly’s Report and Recommendation (ECF 100), recommending that Plaintiff Lamont Bullock’s claims against Defendant Dr. Ronald Long be dismissed with prejudice. Mr. Bullock, proceeding , has filed objections to the R&R. ECF 108; ECF 109. After carefully considering the record and upon a review of the R&R, the Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Kimes v. University of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API