Legal Opinion

Kattar v. Demoulas

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 15, 2000No. 97-2022DPublished

1Opinion of the CourtFremont-Smith, J.

The defendants have brought eviction proceedings against the plaintiffs following defendants’ foreclosure of plaintiffs’ property, premised upon plaintiffs’ default on a $2 million promissory note and mortgage on the property. It is undisputed that, although the note was due and payable on or before December 31, 1989, plaintiffs never made any payment of principle, interest, or taxes on the property, on which they have been operating a family business (a golf course) for a number of years.

Although the Kattars do not dispute that they were and remain in default on their mortgage and promissory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Bonofiglio v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Hull Municipal Lighting Plant v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. T & D Video, Inc. v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Engine Specialties, Inc. v. Bombardier LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API