Legal Opinion
Wooster Feed Mfg. Co. v. Village of Tallmadge
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 1948No. 3934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.
The money judgment for the plaintiff from .which this appeal is taken, is based upon claimed damage to a truck occasioned by its being overturned as a proximate result of the existence of a nuisance in a street in the village of Tallmadge.
The liability of the village for damages was based upon Section 3714, General Code, which in part is as follows:
“The council shall have the care, supervision and ■control of public highways, streets, avenues, alleys, sidewalks, public grounds, bridges, aqueducts, and viaducts, within the corporation, and shall cause them do be kept open, in repair, and free…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gass v. Agate Ice Cream, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kruvant v. DickermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Ohio Power Co. v. JohnstonHancock County Court of Common Pleas · 1968
- Dado v. JeeningaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Otte v. American Airlines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Otness v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.