People v. Tisdel
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman
A jury convicted defendant of first degree murder. The State’s evidence consisted of four eyewitnesses who identified defendant as the shooter in a drive-by shooting. The trial court sentenced him to 35 years in prison. Defendant now appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) refusing to allow expert testimony regarding eyewitness identification; (2) admitting nonidentification lineup testimony; (3) admitting testimony regarding the identification of his codefendant; and (4) allowing lineup photographs to go back to the jury. Defendant also argues that he received ineffective…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- People v. LermaIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- People v. TisdelIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. TisdelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.