Legal Opinion

People v. Tisdel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 2000No. 1-98-0393PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

A jury convicted defendant of first degree murder. The State’s evidence consisted of four eyewitnesses who identified defendant as the shooter in a drive-by shooting. The trial court sentenced him to 35 years in prison. Defendant now appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) refusing to allow expert testimony regarding eyewitness identification; (2) admitting nonidentification lineup testimony; (3) admitting testimony regarding the identification of his codefendant; and (4) allowing lineup photographs to go back to the jury. Defendant also argues that he received ineffective…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. People v. LermaIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. People v. TisdelIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. TisdelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API