Legal Opinion

Westwood Apex v. Contreras

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 2011No. 11-55362PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4, confers federal jurisdiction over class action lawsuits where the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000 and the adversaries are minimally diverse. When a class action satisfying these conditions is filed in state court, Section 5 of CAFA provides that “such action may be removed by any defendant without the consent of all defendants.” 28 U.S.C. § 1453(b). In this appeal, we address whether CAFA Section 5, 28 U.S.C. § 1453(b), allows a party joined to an action as a defendant to a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Carla Visendi v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Michael Bauer v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. In Re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. George Jackson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API