Tingle v. Harvill

While I agree with the conclusion of the majority of . the court as to the *73correctness of the trial court’s judgment granting interlocutory injunction, it is my view that the death of the ward made it impossible for any relief to be granted in the trial court, and rendered all questions moot in this court. See Elliott v. Cline, 184 Ga. 393 (191 SE 372).

Prior to the filing of the appellee’s complaint as guardian of Mary Alice Tingle, the guardianship had been terminated by order finding the ward competent, after hearing by a commission. The guardian appealed from that order.

The purpose of the…