Scott v. Cushman & Wakefield of Georgia, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ellington, Judge.
We granted Hugh H. Scott, Jr. an interlocutory appeal to review whether the trial court erred in denying his motion for partial summary judgment on Cushman & Wakefield of Georgia, Inc.’s claim for real estate commissions. For the reasons which follow, we find that Cushman & Wakefield lacked standing to bring this action and Scott is entitled to partial summary judgment. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s order.
To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Chancellor v. Gateway Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Decatur North Associates, Ltd. v. Builders Glass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Birnbrey, Minsk & Minsk, LLC v. YirgaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Paulsen Street Investors v. EBCO General AgenciesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wirth v. CACH, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Kaesemeyer v. Angiogenix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Nyankojo v. North Star Capital AcquisitionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Johnson v. E. A. Mann & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Ponder v. CACV of Colorado, LLC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.