Anderson v. Ludwig

Defendant’s sole contention is that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter further orders in the action after the order of dismissal of August 18, 1945. Defendants rely upon Wawrzyniakowski v. Hoffman & Billings Mfg. Co. 137 Wis. 629, 119 N. W. 350, which is asserted to hold that where a stipulation calls only for dismissal of the action proceedings are ended and that subsequent proceedings in the action are “entirely unnecessary and outside of anything contemplated mutually by the parties, if not unwarranted.”

Sec. 269.46 (1), Stats., provides:

“The court may, upon notice and just…