Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Unger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint based on the affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction. "An *983essential element of an accord and satisfaction is a clear manifestation of intent by one tendering less than full payment of an unliquidated claim that the payment has been sent in full satisfaction of the disputed claim” (Itoh & Co. v Honerkamp Co., 99 AD2d 417, 418; see, Hudson v Yonkers Fruit Co., 258 NY 168, 174). The person receiving the payment must have "been clearly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Merrill Lynch Realty/Carll Burr, Inc. v. SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc. v. F. W. Honerkamp Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Executive Park West I v. Koock Elan JungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Sorrye v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API