Legal Opinion

The Braeside Foundation v. Carl M. Birkelbach

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 5, 2024No. 23-00305Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 7 ) CARL M. BIRKELBACH, ) No. 23 B 6133 ) Debtor. ) ______________________________________ ) ) THE BRAESIDE FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 23 A 305 ) CARL M. BIRKELBACH, ) ) Defendant. ) Judge Goldgar MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the court for ruling is the motion of defendant Carl M. Birkelbach under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (made applicable by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(b)), to dismiss the adversary complaint of plaintiff The Braeside Foundation. The complaint alleges that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Zena Phillips v. The Prudential Insurance CompaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Dan Richards v. Michael MitcheffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Cancer Foundation, Inc. v. Cerberus Capital Management, LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API