Legal Opinion

Mohacsi v. Rippa

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 13, 2019No. 18-3627-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-3627-cv Mohacsi v. Rippa UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Felix Blondin v. Marthe DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Souratgar v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Mohácsi v. RippaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API